Case 2

Jan 03 2019

Both the parties have assailed the Order of Ld. Chairperson ,MahaRERA dt. Jan. 16,2018. The Ld. Chairperson had taken recourse to the information conveyed by the Promoter on the MahaRERA website. The main crux of the matter at hand lied in the fact that if the Project was shown incomplete as on 9/01/2018, how could an Occupation Certificate be termed as a legal document ? The photographs presented highlighted the shabby state of affairs at the site and were enough proof to hold that the project is inhabitable. The canvass projected by the Promoter about the completeness of the Project was just an eye wash.The Certificate issued by the Architect was clearly erroneous and was drawn upon on the tune of the promoter. Such factually incorrect endorsement calls for condemnation and action. An inspection certifies the grievance of the Allottees to be true.

The promoter cannot be allowed to escape from an obligation stated in the Agreement and raise undesired excuses, to create spike in discharging the time schedule.Needless to indicate, the builder has to herald a legacy of trust and commitment. The allottees cannot be lured. The Promoter’s appeal was dismissed . M/S Sea Princess Realty was directed to pay interest @10% p.a as directed by the Ld.Chairman . Also,Action was to be taken against the Architect for false Certification by informing the correct body .


Request a Call Back